COURSES

Courses · POPULIST-GAMEMODE Jean Monnet Module
JEAN MONNET MODULE · POPULIST-GAMEMODE
Funded by the European Union · Grant Agreement No. 101238497

Two courses,
one conversation
on European
& populist power.

The teaching component of POPULIST-GAMEMODE consists of two complementary master’s-level courses, both hosted by master’s programme Leadership and Communication in International Organizations at the Faculty of History and Philosophy of Babeș-Bolyai University. Together, they examine how leadership shapes decisions in international and European organizations – and how populist actors contest, mobilize or reshape those decisions in the public sphere.

02
Master’s Courses
Delivered in two MA programmes of the Department of International Studies and Contemporary History (DSIIC).
11ECTS
Cumulative Credits
5 ECTS for HMR4312 · 6 ECTS for HMR4229. Both compulsory in at least one host programme.
300h
Teaching Hours
Total commitment under the Jean Monnet Module over 36 months.
European Union
GA No. 101238497
Call for Proposals
ERASMUS-JMO-2025-HEI-TCH-RSCH
Babeș-Bolyai University
Sole Beneficiary · Cluj-Napoca
The Methodology

Three pedagogical pillars
shared across both courses.

The two courses are not standalone disciplines. They are anchored in a shared pedagogical architecture committed in the Grant Agreement and operationalized in every seminar.

01

AI-Assisted Debates

Students use generative AI tools to structure arguments and counter-arguments on contested EU policy options, learning critically when machine reasoning extends, distorts or supplements human deliberation.

Applied in HMR4312 decision clinics · HMR4229 Council simulations
02

Gamified Simulations

Negotiation simulations – Council, Trilogue, ad-hoc summits – operate with mandate tokens, procedural constraints and victory conditions inspired by serious-games design, turning institutional procedures into experiential learning.

Applied in HMR4229 seminar S1-S4 · HMR4312 policy-cycle workshops
03

Fact-Checking Labs

Students verify political statements and decision-relevant data using a standardised four-field method (primary source · verification source · verdict · confidence level), aligned with EUvsDisinfo and EDMO professional practice.

Applied in HMR4229 on populist discourse · HMR4312 on decision evidence
Course 01
HMR4312
Compulsory · Fundamental discipline

Leadership and Decision-Making in International Organizations

Leadership și decizie în organizații internaționale

About the course

Decision-making competence for international organizational settings.

This course develops integrated decision-making competence for international organizational settings. It is structured around three axes: organizational culture and change management, decision-making models, and leadership under crises and public legitimacy pressures.

Through systematic Jean Monnet integration, the course operationalizes theoretical knowledge by analysing EU institutions, decision-making procedures, the policy cycle and the public justification of decisions. Students leave with the capacity to diagnose organizations, model decisions and write policy briefs that hold up under scrutiny.

Curriculum · 14 weeks

Key topics covered.

C1-C2Leadership versus management; legitimacy of decisions
C3-C4Organizational culture (Cameron-Quinn) and change models (Lewin, Kotter)
C5Ethical, public-responsibility and sustainability leadership
C6Transcultural leadership and gender in EU networks
C7-C8Decision fundamentals; decision-making in the EU policy cycle
C9Leadership in crises and conflict
C10Strategic planning and implementation in EU policy
C11Data, technology and AI in decision-making
C12Leadership in international NGOs and EU partnerships
C13-C14Policy-brief workshop and integrative case study
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do.

  • Diagnose organizational culture using validated instruments (OCAI, competing values framework) and propose change interventions aligned with strategy.
  • Model decision processes in international organizations, including procedural constraints, actor configurations and the EU policy cycle.
  • Draft policy briefs of 600 to 1,500 words with implementation plans, indicators and public justification matrices.
  • Publicly justify decisions and anticipate reputational risks across the input – throughput – output spectrum.
  • Facilitate collaborative processes (negotiation, coordination) in multi-disciplinary teams.
Assessment · 100%

How performance is evaluated.

15%
Informed participation · Reading checks, observation, short tests
20%
Seminar presentation · 12-15 min talk with one-page handout and bibliography
15%
OCAI + Lewin workshop · Diagnostic on a hypothetical EU unit (2-3 pages)
10%
Fact-checking lab · Verification of decision evidence (2-page standardized report)
40%
Final policy brief · 1,500-2,000 words + AI-assisted debate + individual reflection
Key Readings · Selection

Foundational literature for the course.

01Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.). Longman.
02Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
03Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership. Harvard Business Press.
04Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
05Mintz, A., & DeRouen, K. R. (2010). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge University Press.
06Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). SAGE.
07Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
Course 02
HMR4229
Compulsory · Fundamental discipline (EPPPE)

The Role of Leadership in the European Union: State and Citizens

Rolul Leadershipului în Uniunea Europeană: Stat și Cetățeni

Cross-listed in two programmes
This course is institutionally embedded in two master’s programmes of the Department of International Studies and Contemporary History: as a compulsory fundamental discipline in EPPPE (Year I, Sem 2, 14 weeks) and as an optional discipline within Optional Package 3 of LCOI (Year II, Sem 4, 12 weeks). Content, evaluation and pedagogical pillars are identical across both deliveries.
About the course

Leadership in the EU as a multi-level governance system.

This course examines how national and European leaders shape decisions in Brussels, how they explain these choices at home, and how populist actors use Europe as a target or a resource in their campaigns. It maps the relationship between state institutions, political parties and citizens through real EU negotiations, election campaigns and referendums.

Students gain analytical command of EU institutions, decision procedures and contemporary populist discourse – building both interpretive depth and practical skills in discourse analysis, simulation participation and evidence verification.

Curriculum · 12-14 weeks

Key topics covered.

C1-C2EU institutions, procedures, leadership roles
C3Negotiation in the EU: presidency, agenda, compromise
C4Institutional leaders in crises (European Council, Commission)
C5National leaders in Brussels: interests, mandates, alliances
C6The two-level game: Brussels versus domestic politics
C7-C8European parties, political groups, voting cohesion
C9Opposition to the EU in the European Parliament
C10Populism: definitions, types, mechanisms
C11Euroscepticism and pro-European populism
C12Identity, attitudes and support for integration
C13EU citizenship and democratic participation
C14Future scenarios for European integration
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do.

  • Explain an EU dossier in terms of actors, interests and procedural constraints; analyse speeches, campaigns and media materials about the EU.
  • Compare political parties’ positions and voting behaviours across the European Parliament and the Council.
  • Factually verify a political statement using standardised methodology and open data sources (Eurostat, Eurobarometer, EUvsDisinfo).
  • Use AI tools critically for argumentation and counter-argumentation in EU policy debates.
  • Formulate evidence-based arguments in AI-assisted debates and institutional simulations (Council, Trilogue, EP committees).
Assessment · 100%

How performance is evaluated.

15%
Informed participation · Reading checks, observation, short tests
20%
Public policy note · 1,500-1,800 words with options, analysis, recommendation, risks
15%
Observatory contributions · 2 coded entries plus 1,000-word synthesis
10%
Fact-checking lab · Verification of populist political statements (2-page standardized report)
40%
EU simulation · Position paper (1,200-1,500 words) + AI-assisted debates + reflections
Key Readings · Selection

Foundational literature for the course.

01Alexandrescu, M. (coord.) (2024). Cetățenii Uniunii Europene. Statut, identitate și perspective. Presa Universitară Clujeană.
02Brack, N. (2018). Opposing Europe in the European Parliament: Rebels and Radicals in the Chamber. Palgrave Macmillan.
03Hobolt, S. B., & de Vries, C. E. (2016). Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 413-432.
04Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109-135.
05Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563.
06Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.
07Tallberg, J. (2006). Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
The Module Ecosystem

How the courses connect
with the rest of the module.

Both courses operate within a wider research and dissemination architecture. Student work feeds the Observatory, informs the annual conference and contributes materials to the module’s publications.

/ 01

Populist Discourse Observatory

A working corpus of populist political statements coded by students, used as seminar material for HMR4229 (Observatory contributions, 15% of evaluation) and as decision-evidence repository for HMR4312 fact-checking labs.

Visit the Observatory
/ 02

Annual Conference

The conference Manipulation and Populism in the European Union extends the curriculum into a research-and-policy forum where students present their best policy briefs and participate as discussants alongside academic and practitioner speakers.

Conference 2026
/ 03

Research & Publications

JGPCD articles, policy papers and edited volumes produced within the module update course reading lists each academic year and provide platforms where student work can be developed into publishable contributions.

Explore publications
Enrolment Information

How to join the courses.

Both courses are open to enrolled master’s students at Babeș-Bolyai University, with conditions varying by host programme. Visiting and Erasmus students are welcome subject to standard FIF procedures.

LCOI Master’s Programme

Leadership and Communication in International Organizations

Both courses are part of the LCOI master’s curriculum. HMR4312 is a compulsory fundamental discipline taken in Year II, Semester 3. HMR4229 is available as an optional course within Optional Package 3 of Year II, Semester 4.

HMR4312 Year II · Sem 3 · DF · 5 ECTS
HMR4229 Year II · Sem 4 · Optional · 6 ECTS
Erasmus & visiting students · contact coordinator

Questions about the courses?
Get in touch.

For curriculum questions, recognition of credits for Erasmus students, or invitations to guest lectures and joint sessions, contact the module coordinator directly. Replies usually within 48 hours during the academic semester.

Assoc. Prof. Mihai Alexandrescu
ioan.alexandrescu@ubbcluj.ro
Department of International Studies
and Contemporary History · DSIIC
Faculty of History and Philosophy
Babeș-Bolyai University · Cluj-Napoca
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
Finanțat de Uniunea Europeană. Opiniile și punctele de vedere exprimate aparțin exclusiv autorilor și nu reflectă neapărat poziția Uniunii Europene sau a Agenției Executive Europene pentru Educație și Cultură (EACEA). Nici Uniunea Europeană, nici EACEA nu pot fi făcute răspunzătoare pentru acestea.